Accretionary Lapilli on Mars? Analysis of Mars Rover Images |
Please email me at ajdurant@mtu.edu if you'd like to comment on anything discussed on this webpage... Updated 30th March 2004 Mars Rover Links: Analysis of Mars Rover Images: 2nd March 2004: Observations From Images on NASA Website (Adam Durant) Latest Publications: NASA Rover Finds Evidence of a Once Wet and Habitable Mars: Eos,Vol. 85, No. 11, 16 March 2004 Other interesting Stuff: 30th March 2004: Methane on Mars: Scientists Unsure if Methane at Mars Points to Biology or Geology (Hubble Space Telescope) Discussion of Analysis: 30th March: Discussion of ripples 2nd March 2004: Observations From Images on NASA Website (Adam Durant) Small spherules present in many of the images collected over the past few weeks by the Mars rovers have characteristics very similar to accretionary lapilli (particle aggregates; see Table 1). The Mars rover scientific team posted a news release on the JPL website on March 2nd 2004 explaining the origin of these features as concretions, supported by some convincing data. Below are some observations and comparisons to deposits on Earth that illustrate these features share strong similarities to accretionary lapilli. The significance of accretionary lapilli present on Mars is the following: on Earth, this specific particle aggregate only forms in a plume containing abundant water. This could be the result of a volcanic magma body interacting directly with a body of water producing a “wet” explosive volcanic eruption (e.g. ocean, surficial water, ground water, ice sheet), or where there has been a asteroid impact involving a similar body of water (e.g. accretionary lapilli deposits associated with the Chicxulub crater asteroid impact). I will first summarize my observations for the following images, and will draw some comparisons to accretionary lapilli from ash layers in the Keanakakoi Ash, Kilauea, Hawaii: this is a good analogy because the dominant volcanism on Mars is basaltic. Following is a table summarizing characteristics of accretionary lapilli:
Table 1: Typical Characteristics of Accretionary Lapilli
Mars Rover Image Archive: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/
Summary of observations (index refers to image on JPL website):
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Hematite signature measured by Opportunity: Here's some interesting articles on iron oxide and its origin on Mars: http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Mar03/Meridiani.html ...quoting researchers from this page, "the hematite may have formed by a later secondary mechanism in preexisting ash beds. In this case, Hynek and his colleagues favor precipitation of the hematite [as opposed to primary formation] when iron-rich fluids circulated within the layered volcanic ash. This kind of secondary formation of the gray hematite, they say, is most consistent with their regional geologic, topographic, and spectral observations." It is completely plausible that volcanic tephra layers could have first been deposited, and then subsequent fluid circulation through these horizons could have formed secondary hematite-rich deposits after deposition. The Mossbauer spectrometer on Opportunity identified the spherules as having peak occurrences of hematite. My only explanation (as an alternate to the concretion hypothesis) would be related to the porosity of accretionary lapilli. If you look at figure 2 showing the cross-sections through the Hawaii acc-laps, you may notice that they have an abundance of circular voids, or vesicles, present within the core: this is typical of accretionary lapilli that I have looked at. These vesicles may act as preferential sites for hematite precipitation from groundwater, producing the elevated hematite signal. This may, however, not be a suitable explanation for some of the spherules, such as the ones in this image taken on Feb 19th: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-images/feb-19-2004/captions/image-1.html
Presence of sulphate in outcrops investigated by Opportunity: Quoting NASA from the news release on March 2nd, 2004 (http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2004/74.cfm), "Jarosite may point to the rock's wet history having been in an acidic lake or an acidic hot springs environment." If these spherules (or at least some of them) are accretionary lapilli, the process that formed them required direct interaction between magma and water. Therefore, the presence of Jarosite provides evidence that there was a body of water present on (or in the upper surface) of Mars at some point in time. Also, accretionary lapilli are usually deposited quite close to source, as their large size (relative to individual particles) causes them to fall out of volcanic plumes fast. The close association between the spherules and Jarosite (indicating wet conditions) may provide some more evidence that there was water nearby to the vent.
Spherules as concretions: This image from Opportunity shows a spherule "triplet": http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-images/mar-18-2004/captions/image-18.html Accretionary lapilli are found as isolated spherules in deposits; I have never seen any with this triplet morphology. Concretions, on the other hand, can take this form. Therefore, I believe that that (at least) some of the spherules in the Mars rover images are concretions. Take a look at the full size image following this link: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/041/1M131832380EFF0574P2952M2M1.HTML The spherule in the lower left of the image has a non-distinct lineation running across it that may be a continuation of the stratification to the right: I think that the origin of this is best explained by the concretion hypothesis.
Spectra taken by Opportunity's Moessbauer spectrometer at various spots in "Eagle Crater": http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA05640
Ripples: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/059/1P133430467EFF0830P2557L7M1.JPG http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/n/059/1N133430407EFF0830P1952L0M1.JPG http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/062/1P133698684EFF08A6P2568L7M1.JPG
Spherules: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA05634 http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040326a/18-BE-08-MIslide-A082R1_br2.jpg 30th March: Discussion of Ripples I'm not an expert on dunes and ripples. However, I think that unless there was water on the surface until very recently (months), aeolian redistribution will mask any surface evidence of fluvial / marine bedforms. Here's some terrestrial aeolian anaologies I found online: Ripples on a dune in Eureka Valley, California LARGE RIPPLES ON EARTH AND MARS. This is not current, but refers to larger features taken by the Viking spacecraft, and it highlights the aeolian origin of dunes investigated during that effort.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|