|
|
|
|
|
Show that different types
have different mobility characteristics as described by relationships
between, L-runout H-height dropped, V-volume, and A-area.
|
|
|
|
Mobility firstly in terms
of L as function of H
|
|
Rockfalls - ratio in order
of (0.6) correspond to tan 30 degrees what we'd expect for small granular
flows. Rf's only travel a few hundred m & are limited to talus apron
around base of dome.
|
|
Pf's - more mobile
|
|
Pumice flows - data less
well constrained but more mobile (black dots)
|
|
|
|
Mobility measured as a
function Log H/L as a function of V suggest block-and-ash flows from
Montserrat (red small flow, blue collapses) & Unzen (white squares) are
systematically slightly more mobile than Non-Volcanic avalanches.
|
|
|